Agroecology to fight climate change

Agroecology is considered a traditional agricultural technique, but it has only gained in popularity in recent years in Europe. France has decided to become the leader of this field by promoting the technique and by implementing it in an experimental network of farms. This technique could be the one needed to make the agricultural system more climate resilient across the world, thus allowing humanity to combat climate change.

What is agroecology?

Agroecology is defined as:

the study of the role of agriculture in the world

However, scholars have pointed out that the definition fluctuates. It is considered a movement, a science or a practice in different parts of the world (Wezel et al. 2009). So, when talking about this notion, one can easily get confused.

In Brazil, agroecology is a movement that emerged in the 1970s to fight against the dependence of farmers on technologies such as GMOs and chemical fertilisers (Wezel et al. 2009).

In Germany, agroecology is a science that is applied on different scales (from the field to the landscape). It analyses ecological and biological processes on a site and then attempts to make use of those processes for the production of food.  Managing the ecosystem in this way allows for agriculture that does not rely on any chemical input (Wezel et al. 2009).

In France, agroecology is viewed as a practice that integrates ecological aspects into agriculture and focusses on the field level. It also has a social dimension, as it aims to create a network of farmers that can share their experience (Wezel et al. 2009).

What is happening in France?

In 2008, the French minister of agriculture launched a project that aims at promoting agroecology. One of its main goals is to reduce the pesticide use by 50% by 2018. This plan was revised in 2015 and the plan Ecophyto II emerged. This plan was implemented to reduce pesticide use by a quarter by 2020 and by half by 2025. The project has led to the development of a network of farms (DEPHY) using low amounts of pesticides and agroecological techniques (see Figure 1). In 2017, the network counted 3600 farms. Moreover, in 2014, the “law of the future for agriculture” (loi d’avenir pour l’agriculture) promoting ecological agriculture was established. This manifested the presence of agroecology in national law.

Screen Shot 2018-04-12 at 18.32.32.png

Figure 1: Distribution of farms from the DEPHY network

How can agroceology help to fight climate change?

As we all know, the agricultural sector will be hit by climate change. In areas where the crops are not near their maximum temperature tolerance, the increase of CO2 will help the sector and higher yields are to be expected. This situation is, however, temporary. With increasing temperatures and more extreme weather events, floods and drought are to be expected. Therefore, the yield will most certainly decrease in the long run (Altieri et al. 2015).

  1. A resilient system

Conventional agriculture is the most prevalent type of agriculture and promotes techniques such as monocultures (IPES-Food 2016). Monocultures are a simplification of the ecosystems and scientists claim that homogenous ecosystems are vulnerable to pest invasions and outbreaks. The expansion of monocultures leads to larger vulnerability of the ecosystems. Thus, it is urgent to add genetic and ecological diversity to agricultural fields. In regions regularly hit by extreme weather events (e.g. Asia, Africa, South America), farmers maintain the biodiversity of the field in order to cope with such uncertain conditions. Greater biodiversity in an ecosystem allows for species richness, which in turn allows for a large set of ecosystem services to be performed (functional diversity). Additionally, it allows for a larger range in responses to stress from the species performing similar ecosystem functions (response diversity). The response and functional biodiversity are the key to the resiliency of an ecosystem. Each species performs slightly different functions that might be redundant when the weather is mild. However, in time of harsh weather conditions, these redundant functions are the key to the survival of the ecosystem: if one species does not survive, another will be there to perform a similar function. The agroecological techniques are not limited to the maintenance of field biodiversity but also include animal integration, soil and water management etc. (see Figure 2) (Altieri et al. 2015).

Screen Shot 2018-04-20 at 11.43.31.png

Figure 2: How can agroecology cope with extreme climatic events (Altieri et al. 2015)

  1. Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions

In addition to offering resiliency to fields, agroecological practices offer the potential to decrease the GHG emission from the agricultural sector. The most obvious way is by not using pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers. The emission associated with such chemicals mainly comes from their manufacture and will widely vary depending on the type of crop and the associated need per field. Although the net GHG emission from fertilizers varies with the farm location, the total GHG emission from fertilizers is quite significant. For example, in North America it accounts for as much as 33% of the total GHG emissions (Snyder et al. 2009).

Another way in which agroecology can reduce GHG emission is by practicing low or zero tillage, which reduces soil disturbances and thus maintains soil organic carbon in the soil pool (Pretty et al. 2006, Snyder et al. 2009). The most fruitful option in terms of GHG reduction is the zero-tillage practice (Pretty et al. 2006). The importance of these practices have been debated, and the consensus seems to be that they only have the potential to significantly reduce GHG in the long run, after more than 10 years of use (Six et al. 2004). Thus, it is important to start now!

In France

In France, the Ecophyto II project has had some difficulties: between 2008 and 2014, pesticide use was increasing across the country. After this period, however, the project has shown that it is possible to have the same yield with fewer pesticides. Between 2010 and 2015, the DEPHY farms have used 18% fewer pesticides on average. Although this greatly varies between the sectors (e.g. fruits, cereals, flowers), this is encouraging for other farmers that might want to follow the same path. Across the country, a decrease of 2.7% of the use of pesticides was observed in 2015, illustrating the large impact of the project. At the moment, it is unfortunately not possible to find data on the reduction of GHG achieved by the project.

In order to boost the pesticide reduction, the government has created a certification of pesticide economy (certifict d’économie de produits phytosanitaires (CEPP)). This project is based on the white certificate concept, which entails that certificates are handed out that confirm a certain level of reduction of energy consumption has been attained. The CEPP promotes the reduction of pesticides across the country.  And why not also across Europe in the long run?


The agroecological project in France is relying on innovative farmers that are not afraid of risk. Ecophyto II could transform agroecology from a pioneering project in Europe to a conventional way of producing food. Because France is the largest agricultural power in the European Union, the project has a large potential to attract other farmers to follow the same path. At the moment, agroecology is being developed around Europe, as the existence of the international NGO Agroecology Europe demonstrates. This NGO aims to “analyse, design, develop and promote the transition towards agroecology-based farming and food systems”. In short, there is hope for a healthier and more climate-resilient agriculture across the world…



Altieri M, Nicholls C, Henao A, Lana M. 2015. Agroecology and the design of climate change resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35(3). Doi: 10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2

IPES-Food. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: a paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems – International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.

Pretty J, Noble AD, Bossio D, Dixon J, Hine RE, Penning de Vries FWT, Morison JIL. 2006. Resource-Conserving Agriculture Increases Yields in Developing Countries. Environ. Sci.Technol. 40(4):1114–1119. Doi: 10.1021/es051670d

Six J, Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Conant RT, Mosier AR, Paustian K. 2004. The potential to mitigate global warming with no-tillage management is only realized when practised in the long term. Global Change Biology 10(2):155–160. Doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00730.x

Snyder C, Bruulsema T, Jensen T, Fixen P. 2009. Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 133(3):247–266. Doi:

Wezel A, Bellon S, Doré T, Francis C, Vallod D, David C. 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Sustainable Agriculture 2:27–43. Doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0394-0_3.



4 thoughts on “Agroecology to fight climate change

  1. Hey! Thanks for your interesting post. Because you got me curious about this topic, I just read an article by the Guardian to get some more info ( In this article it is written that agroecology has also seen some great successes for small-scale farmers in Africa. From what I understood in your blogpost, France is currently experiencing a (small) shift towards agroecology. However, it seems to me that the farms involved in the Ecophyto II project are working more on a small scale rather than on an ‘industrial’ level. Do you think agroecology could be applied to a larger scale? Which potentials do you see? And also: Do you think this could work if there was no ‘top-down’ approach (initiated by the minister of agriculture)? Would something like a bottom-up movement, where farmers cooperate and set common standards and pesticide limits, be plausible (similar to the trans-municipal networks I described in my blogpost where cities set their own targets)? I think it would be a very interesting development to see that happening and I could imagine the DEPHY network to be a good start for this in Europe.


  2. @charlotteeybl Indeed, agroecology is a traditional farming technique that has been used by farmers in the developing countries for generations. However, because of the pressure from the conventional agricultural system, these techniques have been lost in some regions, and some NGOs are trying to help re-establishing these techniques. But because of the many benefits of agroecology, it is considered to also implement it in the developed countries. (I have lots of paper about the topic of agroecology in the developing countries if you are interested 🙂 ).

    The scaling-up of agroecology is an important on-going discussion. Oliver de Schutter (special reporter of the UN) claims that agroecology is the way to go for developing countries and that there is a need for scaling-up. However, this technique, was originally only used on small scales…thus, no real project of scaling-up agroecology has been developed, until France decided to do so (if I am correct). I would say that the French project is already a scaling-up of agroecology. Even though, the project is developed on individual farms and that it will obviously take time before the project expend to a more significant part of the country. I personally think that this project will have several benefits such as a reconnection between the population and nature, less food wasting, boosting local economies… However, there is also challenges because the conversion from conventional agriculture to agroecology is in itself challenging (e.g. the soil from conventional agriculture is poor in nutrient, but agroecology is based on the nutrients naturally present in the soil).

    About your question on the approach, I think that in the case of France, a “top-bottom” approach was necessary to start the project. Indeed, agroecoology is not a very renown technique in the developed countries, so this approach enable to introduce the technique on a national scale. However, Ecophyto II is also aiming at creating a community of farmers so that they can share their experiences and their knowledge to facilitate the transition and the every-day work. This could maybe lead to a “bottom-up” approach in the long run. This will maybe only start when the farmers are not considered as pioneers and their farms as a place for experiments anymore…


  3. Hey! Great topic! You were in your comment you also mentioned the pressure that agricultural organizations put on the agricultural practices in developing countries, I believe this is indeed a major issue. As you mentioned have these people practiced traditional farming for centuries, which is now being disrupted by Western companies seeking profit. Have you heard about the situation of the GMOs in India? The Indian cotton production has been dominated by the huge bio-tech company Monsanto. As they were holding a patent on the cotton seeds the Indian farmers had no other option to buy their overpriced seeds. The fact that they needed to buy new seeds every year (as the seeds were so modified that they only lasted one season) and that the homogenous production system let to resistance to pesticides pushed many farmers in vicious circles of dept. The situation got so bad that for thousands of farmers suicide seemed to the only option left. Despite of the clear damage that Monsanto caused, the company did not change nor dropped their patent.
    I believe just this month the Indian government withdrew Monsanto’s patent, so hopefully, better days are to come for the Indian cotton farmers.
    But this situation shows, how difficult it is to change when a few powerful companies benefit from a certain situation and don’t want it to change. You said that NGOs are trying to re-establish the traditional techniques in developing countries. Do you know how they try to do that? And do you think there will be a lot of global resistance towards to agroecology movement, from for example large companies like Monsanto?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Awesome Laurianne, Agroecology is the future! …and later Vertical Farming 😉

    France also initiated the “4 per 1000” initiative. The idea is, that all the GHG emissions in the world could be offset if soil organic carbon could be increased by 0.4% per year. Soils have a huge potential of storing carbon, which has many other benefits like water retention capacity, biodiversity and productivity (as you explained) – and this is exactly was Agroecology promotes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s